1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 226 F.3d
  5. 226 F.3d 885 (2000)
 

U.S. v. GEE

Nos. 99-2348, 99-3093, 99-2622, 99-2623.

226 F.3d 885 (2000)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Jim GEE and William C. Norris, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided September 11, 2000

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ruth Hennage (argued), Office of the U.S. Attorney, South Bend, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Matthew C. Wagner (argued), Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant Jim Gee.

Charles A. Asher (argued), South Bend, IN, for Defendant-Appellee William Norris.

Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and BAUER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

The United States government charged William C. Norris and Jim Gee in a 32-count indictment in connection with a scheme to assist in the unauthorized reception of cable television signals.1 Before submitting the case to the jury, the government dropped two of the counts against Norris. The jury returned guilty verdicts on all remaining counts. Defendants appeal their convictions and their sentences. The government...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases