Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's right to appear and testify before the Grand Jury pursuant to CPL 190.50 was not violated in any way. Moreover, the defendant's original attorney followed well-reasoned and competent pretrial strategy in advising him that it was not in his best interest to testify before the Grand Jury (see, People v Thompson,
Contrary to the defendant's contention...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.