Defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by the prosecutor's misstatement of law during summation since the error concerned a relatively minor issue in the case. Moreover, the court's instructions to the jury in its final charge served to prevent any prejudice (see, People v Barnes,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. HARTZOG
264 A.D.2d 689 (1999)
695 N.Y.S.2d 356
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GARY HARTZOG, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided September 30, 1999.
Decided September 30, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
