The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning identification.
Defendant's claim that the court rendered an equivocal Sandoval ruling is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find, upon a fair reading of the record of the Sandoval proceeding as a whole, that the court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
