During defendant's direct examination of a defense witness, the court properly precluded questions that called for the states of mind of the witness himself and another person, where neither state of mind had any relevance. Defendant's claim that the court improperly precluded elicitation of a conversation between defendant and the defense witness that would have been relevant to defendant's claim of temporary lawful possession of a weapon, in that it would have shown defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
