We disagree with the IAS Court that plaintiff, defendants and four others not party to this action could have been expected to incorporate the terms of their joint venture in the February 1992 purchase agreement between them, collectively as "Purchaser", and the principals of the corporation that they wished to acquire. Nevertheless, the IAS Court properly rejected plaintiff's belated and unsubstantiated claim of a vague oral agreement between himself and defendants, but...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
