The evidence at trial was legally sufficient to establish defendant's guilt and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's credibility determinations. Given these determinations, there was ample evidence to support the requisite elements of the crimes of which defendant was convicted.
We conclude that defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by the isolated summation remark challenged on appeal (see, People...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
