Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner served as the attesting officer for the voters who signed the designating petition in question. He concedes that he inadvertently failed to indicate on the designating petition any information which would identify him as a commissioner of deeds qualified to administer an oath. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly held that in the absence of such information the designating petition...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
