Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly ordered the courtroom sealed during the testimony of an undercover police officer. The undercover officer testified that (1) he would be returning to the area of the defendant's arrest as an undercover officer, (2) he had received numerous threats, (3) he had pending cases in which he was testifying in the same courthouse, (4) he had previously lost subjects, and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.