1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 86 Ohio
  5. 86 Ohio St.3d 620 (1999)
 

STATE EX REL. GAINS v. ROSSI

No. 99-597.

86 Ohio St.3d 620 (1999)

THE STATE EX REL. GAINS, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, APPELLANT, v. ROSSI, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 29, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Gains, Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney, pro se. James R. Lanzo and James E. Lanzo, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Gains asserts that the court of appeals erred in denying the writ of quo warranto. In order to be entitled to the requested writ of quo warranto, Gains had to establish that Rossi should be ousted from his office of village councilman because he had usurped, intruded into, or unlawfully held or exercised the office. R.C. 2733.01(A) and 2733.14; State ex rel. Watkins v. Fiorenzo (1994), 71 Ohio...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases