Respondent's finding that petitioner improperly solicited money from a tenant to do repair work in the tenant's apartment is supported by substantial evidence, including, in particular, the testimony of the tenant from whom petitioner solicited money. We find no basis for disturbing respondent's credibility findings. However, the penalty of dismissal of this 17-year employee with only two prior minor infractions is so disproportionate to the offense as to shock our sense...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
