1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 193 F.3d
  5. 193 F.3d 496 (1999)
 

GROCE v. ELI LILLY & CO.

No. 98-3105.

193 F.3d 496 (1999)

Frederick H. GROCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided September 30, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael C. Kendall (argued), Indianapolis, IN; Kathleen A. Musgrave, Kendall Law Office, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Brian K. Burke, Ellen E. Boshkoff (argued), Baker & Daniels, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before WOOD, Jr., RIPPLE and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

Frederick H. Groce filed a complaint against his employer, Eli Lilly & Company ("Eli Lilly"), alleging that Eli Lilly had terminated him in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). He also brought state law causes of action against Eli Lilly. The district court granted summary judgment to Eli Lilly on all claims, federal and state. In this appeal, Mr. Groce challenges the district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases