Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The determination by the Board of Appeals on Zoning of the City of New Rochelle denying the petitioner's application for a variance was based on substantial evidence in the record and was not arbitrary and capricious (see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley, 45 N.Y.2d 441; Matter of Dueger v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 96 A.D.2d 905, affd
NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.
As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.