Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Since the construction drawings on which the plaintiff's mechanic's lien is based were not prepared by an architect, engineer, or surveyor, as required under Lien Law § 2 (4), the Supreme Court properly dismissed the second cause of action, which sought foreclosure of the lien (cf., Matter of Di-Com Corp. v Active Fire Sprinkler Corp.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.