Respondents' findings that petitioners knowingly possessed a stolen vehicle and committed related offenses are supported by substantial evidence, including, in particular, the testimony of an expert in automobile theft. No basis exists to disturb respondents' credibility findings (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF DIRUBBIO v. SAFIR
259 A.D.2d 377 (1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 118
In the Matter of VINCENT DIRUBBIO et al., Petitioners, v. HOWARD SAFIR, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 23, 1999.
Decided March 23, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.