The restrictive covenant in issue, which merely prohibits defendant from treating patients introduced to her by plaintiff for a period of one year after termination of her employment, is reasonable as to time and location, and necessary to protect plaintiff's legitimate interest in safeguarding a patient list that clearly is not in the public domain (cf., Reed, Roberts Assocs. v Strauman,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.