STATE v. CURIEL

No. 97-1337.

227 Wis.2d 389 (1999)

597 N.W.2d 697

IN RE the COMMITMENT OF Frank CURIEL: STATE of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Frank CURIEL, Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided July 2, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the respondent-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Jack C. Hoag and Sedor & Hoag, Janesville and oral argument by Jack C. Hoag.

For the petitioner-respondent the cause was argued by Sally L. Wellman, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general.


¶ 1. DONALD W. STEINMETZ, J.

The petitioner, Frank Curiel, seeks review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals1 which upheld a verdict and commitment order of the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County, the Honorable Jeffrey A. Kremers. The circuit court found Curiel to be a sexually violent person under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (1995-96)2 and ordered his commitment.

¶ 2. We are presented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases