1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 259 A.D.2d
  5. 259 A.D.2d 355 (1999)
 

CEPEDA v. TROLMAN

259 A.D.2d 355 (1999)

687 N.Y.S.2d 67

JUAN CEPEDA, Respondent, v. TROLMAN & GLASER, P. C., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided March 18, 1999.

Defendants-appellants' motion for summary judgment should have been granted because plaintiff's assertions in opposition to summary judgment failed to raise a triable issue of material fact (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562). The record shows that each of plaintiff's assertions was speculative or unsubstantiated, or referred to an inconsequential legal error (see, Luniewski v Zeitlin, 188 A...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases