SCOTT v. INSTITUTE FOR URBAN FAMILY HEALTH


259 A.D.2d 354 (1999)

687 N.Y.S.2d 60

BRENDA L. SCOTT, Appellant-Respondent, v. INSTITUTE FOR URBAN FAMILY HEALTH et al., Respondents, and NAOMI IHEDIOHA et al., Respondents-Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided March 18, 1999.


Although the IAS Court did not, in its May 5, 1998 order, technically address that portion of plaintiff's motion seeking amendment, it would be burdensome for us to require plaintiff to return to the motion court to obtain a ruling upon the motion to amend in the circumstances presented where the requested relief would be routinely granted. We note in this connection that plaintiff's motion to amend was fully argued in the motion court and no showing of prejudice attributable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases