The IAS Court properly rejected petitioner's claim that she was denied due process at the fair hearing because an interpreter was not present for the entirety thereof. The record shows that petitioner did not request an interpreter until just before the conclusion of the hearing, did not utilize the interpreter's services to present any additional information, and displayed sufficient ability to understand and speak the English language (see, People v Ramos,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF SIROTA v. HAMMONS
264 A.D.2d 343 (1999)
694 N.Y.S.2d 62
In the Matter of POLINA SIROTA, Appellant, v. MARVA HAMMONS et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided August 19, 1999.
Decided August 19, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.