Defendant's cross-examination of the officer opened the door to the challenged redirect examination and a prior statement was properly admitted to rebut defendant's suggestion of a specific recent fabrication occurring during the trial. In any event, were we to find any error in the receipt of this testimony, we would find such error to be harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt (see, People v Johnson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. HERRALL
259 A.D.2d 347 (1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 18
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TROY HERRALL, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 16, 1999.
Decided March 16, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.