The Supreme Court properly determined that the provisions of the contract at issue are clear and unambiguous and that in accordance with the plain language of the contract, the plaintiff's failure to timely submit billing vouchers precluded it from receiving the reimbursement it sought (see, Matter of Wallace v 600 Partners Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN WITH DOWN SYNDROME, INC v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
262 A.D.2d 340 (1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 656
ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN WITH DOWN SYNDROME, INC, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 7, 1999.
Decided June 7, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.