The motion was properly denied as appellant's proposed defenses that the subject promissory note is not supported by consideration and was induced by fraud lacked merit. Consideration was provided by plaintiff's equity interest in the restaurant he owned with appellant and the other two defendants, and appellant's unsubstantiated claim that the restaurant was insolvent is belied by the fact that defendants were still operating it two years after they gave plaintiff the note...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
