By making a generalized objection, defendant failed to preserve his present challenge to a comment on defendant's credibility contained in the prosecutor's summation, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that it was an isolated and somewhat innocuous comment, and certainly not part of a pattern of inflammatory remarks, and it could not have deprived defendant of a fair trial (see, People v D'Alessandro,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. FREDERICK
259 A.D.2d 335 (1999)
684 N.Y.S.2d 789
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL FREDERICK, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 16, 1999.
Decided March 16, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.