Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court providently exercised its discretion in permitting cross examination as to his prior conviction for possession of marihuana since the prior conviction demonstrated the defendant's willingness to place his interest above that of society (see, People v Dwyer,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.