Defendant's motion to suppress evidence acquired from eavesdropping was properly denied. The application for the eavesdropping warrant made the type of particularized showing of necessity required by CPL 700.15 (4). The affidavits submitted in support of the original warrant depicted a highly sophisticated drug trafficking and money laundering operation about which the investigators had learned significant but limited information using other investigative procedures. The...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
