1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 174 F.3d
  5. 174 F.3d 394 (1999)
 

CHAUDHRY v. GALLERIZZO

Nos. 98-1024, 98-1595.

174 F.3d 394 (1999)

Mohammad H. CHAUDHRY; Diana M. Chaudhry, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael G. GALLERIZZO; Gebhardt & Smith, Defendants-Appellees. James E. Kiley, Jr., Appellant, Mohammad H. Chaudhry; Diana M. Chaudhry, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael G. Gallerizzo; Gebhardt & Smith, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided April 5, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: James Edward Kiley, Jr., Law Offices of James E. Kiley, Jr., P.C., Rockville, Maryland, for Appellants. Louis Jay Ebert, Gebhardt & Smith, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Mark M. Dumler, George R. Calhoun, Gebhardt & Smith, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MURNAGHAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Judge KING joined.

OPINION

MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs, Mohammad and Diana Chaudhry, filed the present action against Defendants Michael Gallerizzo and his law firm, Gebhardt & Smith, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, alleging various violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C.A. &...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases