The motion court properly found that defendant Indian Hotels had consented to the jurisdiction of New York's courts since the guarantees executed by Indian Hotels, in addition to being payable in New York, clearly incorporate the terms of the underlying note which, in turn and with equal clarity, incorporates all of the terms of the Loan Agreement, including its consent to New York jurisdiction clause (see, Dakota Gasification Co. v Natural Gas Pipeline Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
STATE BANK OF INDIA v. TAJ LANKA HOTELS LIMITED
259 A.D.2d 291 (1999)
686 N.Y.S.2d 44
STATE BANK OF INDIA et al., Respondents, v. TAJ LANKA HOTELS LIMITED, Defendant, and INDIAN HOTELS COMPANY LIMITED, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 4, 1999.
Decided March 4, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
