HAMILTON v. CITY OF NEW YORK


262 A.D.2d 283 (1999)

691 N.Y.S.2d 108

ERNESTINE HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, L.K. COMSTOCK & CO., INC., Appellant, and NEW YORK PAVING, INC., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 1, 1999.


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the cross claim by L.K. Comstock & Co., Inc., against New York Paving, Inc., is reinstated.

The defendant New York Paving, Inc. (hereinafter Paving) was not entitled to summary judgment dismissing the cross claim asserted against it by the appellant L.K. Comstock & Co., Inc. (hereinafter Comstock). The papers submitted in support of the motion failed to include copies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases