Defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied. Defendant's claim that the lack of an interpreter at the identification procedures cast doubt on the nature of the complainants' accusations against him is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find this claim to be irrelevant to the issue of suggestiveness.
The record, which reveals that defendant was granted all the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
