Defendant's complaints about the admission of testimony by the undercover officer involved in this transaction regarding the role of various players in a street narcotics sale are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that, in this accessorial liability case, this limited testimony was admissible to negate defendant's agency defense (People v Colon,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. BROWN
259 A.D.2d 273 (1999)
684 N.Y.S.2d 780
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERIC BROWN, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 2, 1999.
Decided March 2, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.