The IAS Court properly determined that the letters submitted by plaintiffs did not adequately notify defendant of the underlying claim. In addition, we reject plaintiffs' alternative contention that their notice of claim, given over one year after the underlying action was instituted, and after judgment subsequent to a trial had been entered against plaintiffs requiring them to restore the building, was reasonable under the circumstances. Plaintiffs knew that the claim against...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
