The court's findings were based on legally sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record. We note that the record amply supports the court's conclusion that the inconsistency in testimony between the agency's two witnesses regarding the exact location of the fire set by appellant was predicated on an inconsequential mistake of fact by one of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
