Defendant's challenges to the court's charge on reasonable doubt are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that although the preferred phrasing was not always employed by the court, the charge, when read as a whole, conveyed the appropriate standards (see, People v Cubino,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. FONSECA
262 A.D.2d 239 (1999)
690 N.Y.S.2d 456
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANCISCO FONSECA, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 29, 1999.
Decided June 29, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
