The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence connecting defendant to the crimes of which he was convicted, including tape recordings of wiretapped conversations in which defendant's identity was established by a witness who was familiar with his voice.
Defendant's claim that the court's restrictions on counsel's cross-examination of the People's witnesses deprived him of a fair trial...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
