Defendant's challenge to the court's jury instruction on the definition of burglary is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that in this case involving unlawful entry and not unlawful remaining, the court's erroneous references to unlawful remaining could not have misled the jury (see, People v Ray,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. HARRIS
261 A.D.2d 237 (1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 884
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANDRE HARRIS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 18, 1999.
Decided May 18, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.