Defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied. The lineup was not unduly suggestive, and defendant's only "distinctive" characteristic, his hair style, was not an issue, since all members of the lineup wore hats. There is no indication in the record that defendant asked for an attorney to be present during the lineup, and, in any event, there is no obligation to supply one for an investigatory lineup, as was conducted here (see, People v Hawkins...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.