Plaintiffs' claims based on an alleged oral promise not to terminate the contracts between plaintiffs and the corporate defendants were properly dismissed since the written agreements prohibited oral modifications and plaintiffs alleged neither full performance of the alleged modification nor partial performance unequivocally referable to the oral promise (General Obligations Law § 15-301 [1]; Rose v Spa Realty Assocs.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
O'REILLY v. NYNEX CORPORATION
262 A.D.2d 207 (1999)
693 N.Y.S.2d 13
BERNARD O'REILLY et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. NYNEX CORPORATION et al., Respondents-Appellants, and ROBERT VAN DOVER, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 22, 1999.
Decided June 22, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.