Defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied. The victim's prompt identification of defendant at a subway station close in both space and time to the robbery situs was not rendered unduly suggestive by the circumstance that police officers merely asked the witness if he recognized defendant (see, People v Duuvon,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. FACEY
261 A.D.2d 207 (1999)
690 N.Y.S.2d 51
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANDREW FACEY, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 13, 1999.
Decided May 13, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.