1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 194 F.3d
  5. 194 F.3d 252 (1999)
 

HIGGINS v. NEW BALANCE ATHLETIC SHOE, INC.

No. 99-1043.

194 F.3d 252 (1999)

Robert E. HIGGINS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. NEW BALANCE ATHLETIC SHOE, INC., Defendant, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided October 22, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Gause, with whom Berman & Simmons, P.A., Burton G. Shiro, and Shiro & Shiro Law Offices were on brief, for appellant.

Bernard J. Kubetz, with whom Thad B. Zmistowski and Eaton, Peabody, Bradford & Veague, P.A. were on brief, for appellee.

Before SELYA, Circuit Judge, CYR, Senior Circuit Judge, and BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Robert E. Higgins sued his former employer, defendant-appellee New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. (New Balance), claiming, inter alia, hostile environment sex discrimination (relating to actions of, and remarks by, his supervisor and co-workers, allegedly on account of his homosexuality), retaliatory discharge (relating to his frequent complaints about activities in the factory that he thought were unsafe or illegal), and disability...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases