The jury verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's credibility determinations. There was ample evidence that defendant robbed the complainant and that defendant's claimed intoxication did not prevent him from forming the requisite intent.
Defendant was not deprived of his right to present a defense when the court denied his request for a continuance to produce additional...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.