1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 262 A.D.2d
  5. 262 A.D.2d 133 (1999)
 

CHOCOLAS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. HANDELSMAN

262 A.D.2d 133 (1999)

691 N.Y.S.2d 519

CHOCOLAS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al., Respondents, v. BURTON HANDELSMAN et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided June 15, 1999.

The trial court properly determined that the terms of the settlement agreement between the parties were sufficiently ambiguous to warrant the introduction of extrinsic evidence, despite the existence of a merger clause (see, Concoff v Occidental Life Ins. Co., 4 N.Y.2d 630), and in light of the trial testimony, particularly that evidencing the parties' previous conduct under the same right of first refusal provision, the court properly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases