Inasmuch as the money damages that defendant seeks in some of its counterclaims will not protect it from plaintiff's continued use of allegedly confidential information and documents, it is clear that the thrust of defendant's counterclaims, the only claims remaining to be litigated, is equitable in nature, and thus plaintiff is not entitled to a jury trial (see, Downtown Art Co. v Zimmerman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MULDER v. DONALDSON
261 A.D.2d 134 (1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 470
JOSEPH M. MULDER, Appellant, v. DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 4, 1999.
Decided May 4, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
