1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 261 A.D.2d
  5. 261 A.D.2d 130 (1999)
 

BRITELL v. SLOAN'S SUPERMARKET, INC.

261 A.D.2d 130 (1999)

687 N.Y.S.2d 258

ANDREA C. BRITELL, Respondent, v. SLOAN'S SUPERMARKET, INC., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. SLOAN'S SUPERMARKET, INC., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. GEORAL DOOR SERVICE CORP., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 4, 1999.

Defendants' claim that they were prejudiced by a summation comment urging a $400,000 award for past pain and suffering is without merit, since the comment, assuming it was improper (cf., Torrado v Lutheran Med. Ctr., 198 A.D.2d 346), was an isolated one that did not reflect the overall tenor of the summation (see, Schechtman v Lappin, 161 A.D.2d 118, 121). The $125,355.30 award for past...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases