The dissolution proceeding advanced by defendants as the predicate for their various preclusion claims, was based on allegations that dissension between former partners of the dissolved firm had caused the firm to stop functioning efficiently. The litigation of those allegations did not involve the litigation of the issues pertinent to the presently alleged claims of breach of fiduciary duty, fraud and conversion and, accordingly, was properly found by the motion court to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
