Defendant's claims that the court should have granted him an unspecified adjournment so that Rosario material provided the weekend before jury selection could be translated into Spanish for his benefit, and that the lack of such adjournment prevented him from exercising his constitutional rights to effectively discuss his case with his attorney, confront witnesses, and actively participate in his own defense are unpreserved for appellate review. There was, however...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
