SCHOENWANDT v. JAMFRO CORP.


261 A.D.2d 117 (1999)

689 N.Y.S.2d 461

FRED C. SCHOENWANDT, Respondent, v. JAMFRO CORP. et al., Defendants, and BURGER KING CORPORATION, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 4, 1999.


Defendant BKC should have been granted summary judgment. The record shows the relationship between BKC and defendant Jamfro Corporation to be merely franchisor-franchisee, and there is no showing of the existence of a parent-subsidiary relationship, let alone of the means by which BKC purportedly exercised the complete domination and control of Jamfro's daily operations or how such control resulted in plaintiff's injury (see, Pebble Cove Homeowners' Assn. v Fidelity N...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases