BARK v. QUEENSBORO FARM PRODUCTS, INC.


261 A.D.2d 103 (1999)

689 N.Y.S.2d 90

CHANG G. BARK et al., Appellants, v. QUEENSBORO FARM PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 4, 1999.


The IAS Court properly concluded that there were no facts supporting plaintiff's contention that defendant Queensboro supervised the work-related activities of plaintiff's alleged assailant and should therefore be held vicariously accountable for the assailant's conduct (see, Lazo v Mak's Trading Co., 84 N.Y.2d 896). Indeed, the assailant had been retained for the day not by defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases