BERTHELOT v. DEZSO

No. 99-359.

86 Ohio St.3d 257 (1999)

BERTHELOT, APPELLANT, v. DEZSO, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 1, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zashin & Rich Co., L.P.A., and Robert I. Zashin, for appellant.

Michael T. Callahan, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Barbara Crouse Babbit, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee Judge Carol J. Dezso.

Lieberth & Anderson, L.P.A., and Dreama Anderson; Maistros & Loepp, Ltd., and Thomas C. Loepp, for appellee Michael J. Berthelot.


Per Curiam.

Maureen asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing her claims for extraordinary relief in mandamus and prohibition. She claims that Judge Dezso has no discretion to deny her discovery and an evidentiary hearing to redetermine spousal support following the court of appeals' reversal and remand of the original spousal support award. For the following reasons, Maureen's assertions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases