The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning identification and credibility.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The record supports the court's findings that at the time in question defendant was detained for identification purposes rather than being arrested (see, People v Hicks,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.